The Goddesses & Gods of India
Decoding Hindu Iconography
While the previous article was on Dharma and identity, I am attempting to write here on Hindu Iconography & Symbols. Recognising relevance of Icons in the modern context form part of realising and reviving our identities. Hindu art is creative and expresses the spiritual view of the land of ancient India. On that note, I believe you will enjoy this article.
The science and art of ancient Hindu symbolism and iconography were sophisticated and complex. While the ancient Indians were creative in their expression, the idea of icons expressing and communicating concepts and spiritual ideas of the civilisation is all but lost in modern India. There is an increasing disconnection between the current generation of Indians and the forms of ancient Hindu art, symbols, sculpture & architecture.
The disconnection could be associated to various factors not limited to an education system that is designed to erode away any appreciation of the country’s own civilisation & culture, lack of interest in studying art due to a mindset that education is solely seen as a future financial investment, political, lack of parental motivation, to name a few. The intent of this blog is to make an attempt to analyse these symbols thoroughly and extract the underlying principles and concepts so that the symbols and icons are seen as truly relevant to modern Indians.
Terminology:
So, why the word Icon and not Idol ?
Icon (derived
from the Greek word eikṓn) is a religious work of art generally used in the Christian
cultures. It is a sacred religious symbol used for religious devotion.
Idol, on
the other hand, is a derogatory word used by Europeans to describe Hindu Gods
& Goddesses. Idol derived from
the Greek word eidolon or phantom
(illusory / not real) and symbolises something that is misleading or mysterious.
Therefore, if you must use English terminology, I suggest use of the word Icon.
In Sanskrit, however, a few words for an ‘Icon’ are:
Bimba = reflection
Vigraha = expansion, extension or form
Bera = image
Pratimā = representation, resemblance
Mūrti = anything that has definite shape and physical limitations, an embodiment or an incarnation (etat sarvam yanmūrtam cāmūrtam ca tasmān mūrtir eva rayi:) - Prashnopanishad
Pratīka = symbol
Rupa = an aggregrate form
Arca = an object of (devotional) adoration and worship
Purpose of Icons:
Human interaction and understanding occurs
through symbols. Words themselves are symbols that have a deep symbolic
significance used to communicate (reference).
We use symbols every day to convey ideas such as its growing use in chats such
as Whatsapp, Skype, etc. Ancient Indians as well developed sophisticated forms
of symbols to communicate ideas, principles and forces that sustain the cosmos.
These fundamental attributes of the cosmos and their presiding consciousness
cannot be perceived, however, they are certainly experienced and the icons are
the symbols of those experiences. Examples of these principles are, to name a few:
creativity, the potential for logic and reasoning, love, action, anger, greed,
ego, success, intellect, achievement, loss, wealth, prosperity, pollution, etc.
While love cannot be perceived (even by the experiencer), it can, however, be represented with a symbol of heart - the heart being the symbol to communicate the feeling of love. Needless to say, one cannot deny the principle of love so as well one cannot deny the symbol that stands for love. Therefore, as long as the feelings are real and the symbol that represents the principle as well indeed real.
In order to remind the society of the forces and principles of nature and to interact with this potentials a form / categorisation (ākāram) is given. The Vedas reveal that the entire universe comprises of categories - name (nāma) and form (rūpa) - anena jīvena ātmanā anupravishya, nāma rūpa vyākaravāni (Chāndogya Up.). Therefore, the purpose of the icons is to establish a form to interpret the experience of the divine forces and to communicate that to others.
Let me further explain with two examples
to understand the language of Iconography symbolising the presiding deities. I
have carefully selected these two examples below based on applicablity of human
experiences. They have straightforward relevance to all.
I believe the reader, regardless of your
sampradāya or lineage or tradition, will be able to relate to the below
reasoning behind the icons from a larger Hindu audience. My appeal and attempt
is certainly not sectarian and is for all Hindus and as well those interested in Hindu iconography
to unite, understand and appreciate the deeper concepts of Hindu art, culture,
its practices and tradition. However, you will note that these symbols apply to
all beings and not limited to Hindus.
I will expand further on both Pancaratra and other Hindu iconography
and symbolism in future blogs when time permits to the best of my ability.
1. Lord Ganesha
In order to understand the icon one must
first understand the idea packed in the Sanskrit word used for the icon.
Etymology: Ganesha = Gana + Esha
Gana = Logics, Maths (Ganita), categorisation, and
Esha
= the Lord of that principle
Therefore, Ganesha = The lord of all principles of logics and categorisation
So, what does the rat represent? Think
of how the rat behaves. It moves in corners and sticks to dark and dirty places.
The mushika (the rat) is representative of our minds which has a tendency to
move into dark places if not checked – i.e. being negative, pessimist, cranky,
moaner, etc. Lord Ganesha or the principle of logic (within us) has the
potential to overcome the negative mind in a given situation.
The Icon of Lord Ganesha along with his vāhana (vehicle) also symbolise that of all obstacles the major obstacle is our own mind, therefore, Lord Ganesha being the principle of logic is able to categorise (recognise) the negative mind and having recognised , therefore, assist you in applying necessary controls to overcome the negative mind and perform your actions skillfully. He is also said to be the remover of all obstacles. Obstacles that primarily originate in our own mind due to its negative tendencies and as well from outside through other beings or situations.
He has two consorts – Siddhi and Buddhi.
· Siddhi = Success
· Buddhi = Intellect
In summary, the derived meaning of Lord Ganesha along with his consorts is: The mind must apply skillful reasoning (logic + categorisation) in a situation using intellect (Buddhi) to perform an action skillfully then there is potential for success (Siddhi).
In northern India, Riddhi is said to be a third consort
Riddhi = Progress
Once there is Siddhi (continuing from above) which is success in life projects or in situations we face, there is progress (riddhi) in life. All aspects of icons represent basic function of life as a cosmic principle.
2. Kāma devā
The icon of Kāma Devā is said to be a handsome man riding a parrot with a bow made of sugarcane, strung with humming bees and shoots floral arrows. His consorts are ratī and prīti.
Kāma = desire
Devā = Lord
He is also called manmathan – the churner of the mind or the one who agitates the mind
He is the Lord of Desires or He can be said to be the presiding principle.
Let us take, for example, love as a form of desire. Love is sweet (represented by the bow made of sugarcane) at the same time it can hurt (reminded to us by the bees – if the bee stings it hurts).
5 x floral arrows = fascination (unmada), distress (tapana), draining (shoshana), stiffening (stambana) and infatuation / delusion (sammohana).
His consorts:
Ratī = the principle/potential of lustful desire
Prītī = the principle of kind, graceful and devotional love
In our lives, we note both these types of love driven by desires.
Ratī being the lustful / erotic love, and
Prītī being the compassionate and devotional love towards parents, elders, our children and other family, friends, birds and animals.
Do Gods & Goddess exist?
Given that the Hindu Gods &
Goddesses are the principle forces of nature that we experience daily, the answer
to the above question is easy – YES of course they exist. If we deny their
existence then we deny the very concept of our living and our daily life
experiences itself. The applicability (principles of nature) is not just to humans but to common to all living beings.
They exist as the presiding potentials and principles that cannot be perceived but experienced and not literally as the icons and symbols we use only to understand these cosmic principles.
Arguing over existence of a physical form of an Elephant headed god or a Monkey god are worthless because it is a representation of a priceless ideal that has benefits passing down the evolutionary chain.
The representations of the principles give us advantages over other living beings that lack the same and so Hinduism is a system of passing down ideals and not belief in imaginary overlords that grant wishes and punish the rule breaker.
It is said:
आहार निद्रा भय मैथुनं च समानमेतत्पशुभिर्नराणाम् ।
ज्ञानं नराणामधिको विशेष: ज्ञानेन हीनाः पशुभिः समानाः ॥
Protection from & interaction with Gods & Goddesses:
In the Mahabharata, the minister Vidura says to King Dritarāshtra of Hastināpur the following:
न देवा दण्डमादाय रक्षन्ति पशुपालवत् ।
यं तु रक्षितुमिच्छन्ति बुद्ध्या संविभजन्ति तम् ॥
na devā dandamādāya rakshanti pashupālavat ।
yam tu rakshitum ichchhanti buddhyā samvibhajanti tam ॥
It is said that when the forces of nature (Deva – the gods) want to protect one, they DO NOT protect like a shepherd with a stick but provide the person with intelligence to reason in order to skillfully overcome situations, challenges and hurdles.
To reiterate again the above examples (not in extreme detail) are a taster. In my next blog, I will attempt to take a deeper dive into Sri Vishnu tattva of Pāncaratra āgama.
Excellent blog!
ReplyDeletePrecisely and beautifully explained about our Hinduism and its practices in order to overcome our day to day hardships to gain control over our base instincts as human beings born in society.
ReplyDeleteVery well explained Swamin. Looking forward for more detailed articles on this topic. Understanding the symbolism of each deity and worshiping will add more meaning.
ReplyDelete- Dasan, Balaji
The analysis is a rare piece of research. Very interesting.
ReplyDeleteVery Interesting article Abhishek.
ReplyDeleteVery nicely crafted writeup. This reminds me of Sri Aurobindo, who has a firsthand experience of the gods and godesses as revealed to the Rsis of the Veda. I firmly believe that one can truly appreciate the essential, deeper and esoteric meaning underlying the symbols only when one sincerely practices the relevant yoga which and which only can reveal the ultimate truth where the symbol would have become the symbolised. शुभं भूयात्।
ReplyDeleteNice article. One question. . Do we still need to use the word God for Ishwara, Bhgvan, Sakti, etc? Rajiv Malhotra has come out with a new book “ Sanskrit, non translatable, The importance of Sanskritizing English “. I am sure you will find it very interesting. Thanks again for a wonderful enlightening article.
ReplyDeleteDr Rama Krishnan
Well analysed and presented swami! This article presents logical reasoning to
ReplyDeleteour religious concepts. Look forward to more such articles.
Very beautifully explained... need of the hour today when many so called modern artists who in the name of freedom of expression completely distort and misrepresent the sacred Icons of our Sanatana Dharma..today's youth need this logical explanation inorder understand the real significance of these divine forms...our ancient Shilpa shastra, mural paintings etc reflect the true devotion of the great artists...their works are an expression of divinity inside out..And if you look at East ,west,north or south of India the basic iconography of each of the Devataa are pretty much similar barring very minor differences here and there...Our great artists of yester years had a logical and intellectual understanding of divine art...their total surrender to their art made them instruments of Divine expression...when the divine expresses itself be it in whichever part of bharata through a chosen instrument there is a lot of coherence and similarity...That's why you will find that for eg...there is a lot of similarity between the shilpa of Ganesha in a temple in near the Himalayas to a arca of Ganesha in a remote village in Kerala....most importantly logic prevailed.Todays artists need to under stand this that true art is a divine expression which happens only as a result of true surrender.. continue this brilliant work of yours.. coz in today's world PRINT is mightier than sword and writing is also an art in its own right
ReplyDeleteGood one on Santana Dharma
ReplyDeleteSimple,straightforward and easy to understand. Should be a part of our primary curriculum
ReplyDeleteExcellent explanation
ReplyDelete